Bob Crum

I concluded my previous column with this question: Did I post-process the photo of the week? Silly question, right? Of course I did. I'm resubmitting the photo again as a reference for the following discussion. (See the photo in color at fillmoregazette.com) Even though the camera's histogram revealed proper exposure, the camera did not correctly capture all of the elements of the photo. Here's why and the corrections I applied to improve it.

A camera/lens combo cannot see as our human eyes see. A filter on the sensor generates RGB pixels. But seldom does the filter/sensor combination capture the Kelvin of the light (color) accurately. The sensor sends image data to the recording medium. Unless the camera is ultra-high-tech, the dynamic range of the light will exceed the camera's ability to record it entirely. The camera's picture-style algorithms also affect the image produced — multiple reasons why no photo straight out of the camera is as good as it could be.

I like to evaluate a scene before making a photo. Taking a moment to study the scene also helps the mental recall during post-processing. The camera settings for the reference photo were: 'Auto' ISO and shutter speed 1/100 second. I closed aperture to f/22 to create the Sunstar effect. I know that closing the aperture f/22 means underexposing the image. (Remember the exposure triangle?) To compensate, I could slow the shutter speed further or manually increase the ISO. However, shooting hand-held, I prefer not to go slower than 1/100th second to minimize handshake (blur). The camera automatically raised the ISO to 1,000, somewhat high but passable. Nevertheless, the photo lacks the dynamic range of light at the scene. Capturing in RAW mode will permit me to make appropriate adjustments during post-processing.

I made several photos in portrait and landscape mode. On the monitor back home, I was not surprised to see some anticipated issues. Landscape orientation the obvious choice because I wanted to include the Spanish moss on the horizontal branches on the left. (See the hanging moss?)

In the original RAW file, the moss color is wrong. Also, the bright sun flummoxed the camera's exposure meter, discombobulating the overall exposure. Ugh! And the lichen on the tree lacked the texture that I saw in real-time. Adobe Lightroom (LR) to the rescue! First, quaffed a strawberry margarita, you know, to finesse creativity.

Recall that a RAW file is not yet a photo, just data LR (or any other RAW converter) interprets and forms an image. I exposed the photo for the bright sun, which I knew would underexpose the lower half of the image. Had I exposed for the shadows, the top half of the image would be overexposed. I easily brought back details in the shadows with the LR gradient filter which allows for adjustments of exposure, contrast, highlights, clarity, & saturation in the defined area.

I next tweaked clarity and texture. In the color panel, I decreased blue luminosity slightly to restore sky color. I increased overall contrast slightly. Now the photo is beginning to look as I saw the scene in real time. The last LR step was to apply lens correction. Depending on lens quality and the settings, lenses are notorious for producing various kinds of distortion, chromatic aberration, and perspective issues. LR usually fixes most lens issues, if they exist. This creative process took about three minutes and, yes, I'm legally allowed to have such fun! But I was not yet done! I exported the image, in the tiff format, to Photoshop Elements 2020 (PSE), with NIK plugins. In the tiff format, it's now a digital photo, not just data. To be continued...

Wishing you the Merriest Christmas and a Happy, Healthy New Year!

Send questions, suggestions or comments to: focusonphotography@earthlink.net

Former Fillmore Mayor Manuel Minjares on Fillmore City Council's temporary moratorium of hemp production inside Fillmore city limits.

The following opinion expressed by former Fillmore Mayor Manuel Minjares was taken from a public Facebook post:

“I want to add a little more context to this issue because Fillmore has wrestled with cannabis in the not too distant past.

On November 6, 2018, Measure T, a Fillmore City Council led measure that sought Fillmore voters say on commercial cultivation of cannabis in specific, business park and industrially zoned areas. The measure ensured that any cultivation would be conditioned to occur within an enclosed building with significant air filtration to mitigate any odor issues. This measure was defeated, 54% - 46%.

The moratorium that the city has passed only affects the few vestiges of agriculture WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS. Our moratorium does not affect or impact agricultural uses outside of our city limits. Our moratorium is also not a permanent ban on industrial hemp cultivation either. It does however give the City time to look at options and different regulatory scenarios.

Without this moratorium, agricultural properties WITHIN our City Boundary could simply register with Agricultural Commissioners office and start growing hemp mere feet from our residentially zoned neighborhoods. Despite what some believe or even care to consider, the odor from outdoor cannabis cultivation has a significant impact on many people, unlike any of our other crops in this country in my opinion.

To be clear, I'm a big supporter of agriculture in our county and as a matter of fact, have been a vocal proponent of well regulated cannabis cultivation within our city limits. I am also aware that certain land uses are going to conflict with one another and can negatively impact the quality of life of many if not regulated appropriately.

To summarize:
1. Fillmore voters said NO to commercial cannabis cultivation on 11/6/2018.

2. Fillmore City Council voted to enact a temporary moratorium on industrial hemp cultivation on 12/10/19.
I felt it was necessary to enact a moratorium before any unmitigated outdoor cultivation could occur with in city limits, directly adjacent to residential development.

3. The Fillmore moratorium only applies to the few pieces of remaining agricultural properties within the city limits.
The Fillmore moratorium does not apply to agricultural properties outside of the city limits where over 99.9% of all agricultural cultivation occurs and should occur.

4. Fillmore City staff will be working on options for regulating industrial hemp for a council decision likely to occur in 2020.”

The Citrus Packing House, a repurposed creative campus at 341 A St. in the Ventura County city of Fillmore, CA, has traded for $1,420,000.00, according to Matt Benwitt of Lee & Associates-LA North/Ventura, who represented the seller in the transaction.

The 79,000 square foot property at A Street and Sespe Avenue was built as a packing house in two phases in 1917 and 1925 and eventually was used by Sunkist. Under the ownership of the seller, David Storrs, it was repurposed as a group of workshops for craftspeople known as the Packinghouse Creative. Tenants include makers of musical instruments along with Funky Junk Farms, a company that specializes in restoration and preservation of vintage trailers and RVs used for props and filming, and a memorabilia collector. It is located in an Opportunity Zone. The buyer, Brad Vernon, is expected to continue to use the property for creative tenants.

Fillmore Unified School District

Approve Start and End Dates for 2020-2021 School Year
The Governing Board approved a start date for staff to be on Monday, August 17, 2020, followed by a first student day held on Thursday, August 20, 2020. Pending collaboration from both employee units, the last day for students would be June 3, 2021, followed by a teacher workday on June 4, 2021.

Approve Resolution 19-20-12 Regarding Census 2020 The Governing Board approved Resolution 19-20-12.

Approve Tentative Agreement between the Fillmore Unified Teachers Association (FUTA) and the Fillmore Unified School District (FUSD)
The Governing Board approved the Tentative Agreement reached during the last mediation session.

Approve Certificated/Certificated Special Education/School Psychologist/Coordinator/Nurse/ROP/Vocational Salary Schedules
The Governing Board approved the Certificated/Certificated Special Education/School Psychologist/Coordinator/Nurse/ROP/Vocational salary schedules.

Personnel Recommendations
The Board approved all personnel recommendations including new hires, promotions, resignations, and leaves.