Written by C D Michel

On October 7, 2010, the CRPA Foundation filed its Reply brief in support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction to block enforcement of AB 962 immediately while the case is litigated. The lawsuit alleges that AB 962 is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to provide sufficient notice of what ammunition is "principally for use in a handgun," and thus "handgun ammunition" that is regulated under AB 962. It is impossible to determine whether the thousands of different types of ammunition suitable for use in handgun are "principally for use in," or used more often in, a handgun.

The legislature was... http://calgunlaws.com/index.php/current-litigation/82/926.html