|
School Budget Controversy Continues
By Mariandrea Mueller — Wednesday, May 13th, 2009
The YouTube audio/video located here may not appear for some readers. Some institutions choose to block all YouTube content. If you do not see an audio/video player located here, please use the audio/video player located above. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Confusion surrounds much of the controversy between the District Office and School Employees. Issues include a debate over how many employees are needed at the District Office, limited access to public information, uncertainty over administrators’ salaries, and anonymous communications to the Gazette. At the April 21st Board Meeting, FUTA President Theresa Marvel had accepted the Board’s offer to hear alternate proposals from the public, and handed out a written budget-cutting proposal suggesting that the District reduce the number of top-level administrators, primarily by demoting administrators and reducing the number of work-days in their year. Marvel argued that the District Office was over-staffed, based on her analysis of other districts’ staffing levels. Marvel’s analysis of the number of top-level administrators in Fillmore, Ojai, Oak Park, and Ventura was based on data she gathered from the Ventura County Public Schools Directory (VCPSD), as published on its website. Assistant Superintendent Evalene Townend disputed those numbers, and provided the Gazette with her own lists based on phone conversations with employees of the referenced districts. The Gazette examined Ventura Unified’s numbers as a sample to determine whether Marvel’s analysis was inconsistent with the data provided. Marvel counted only Supervisors, Assistant Supervisors, Directors, and Coordinators, because she was primarily interested in reducing top-level staff. Townend’s lists of District Office staffs listed many more employee at each office, including specialists, secretaries, and clerks. She noted that Ventura Unified had 135 employees at the District Office. The Gazette based its analysis on the VCPSD but counted Managers and Assistant Directors, in addition to the top-level employees that Marvel counted. Marvel’s count of Ventura Unified included 1 Superintendent, 3 Assistant Superintendents, 13 Directors, and 1 Coordinator. The modified count included 1 Superintendent, 3 Assistant Superintendents, 13 Directors, 2 Coordinators, 4 Assistant Directors, and 2 Managers. From the job titles listed on the web site, it was difficult to tell whether some positions were top-level or support staff. In fact, a person listed as “Risk Manager” on the web site was listed by Townend as “Director of Risk Management”. Whether Marvel is correct in concluding that Fillmore is top-heavy with school administrators is a matter for the School Board to determine, but her data is not inaccurate enough to damage her argument. Another point of dispute has been Superintendent Jeff Sweeney’s salary. Despite the fact that, as Sweeney has written, “All District salaries are verifiable and public information,” obtaining salary information from the District has been difficult. A member of Friends of Piru, a parent association at Piru Elementary School, said that she requested salary information from the District several times. Finally, on April 28th, upon submitting another identical request for the information, District staff provided her with a form to fill out, which she did. As of May 12, 2009, she has still not received a response. Another concerned citizen told the Gazette that she was unable to get salary information from anyone at the District Office other than Sweeney himself. The Gazette requested a salary schedule for all FUSD employees on April 21st. On April 22nd, Assistant Superintendent Mike Bush provided salary schedules consisting of lists of positions and various salary levels for each position without indicating which level each staff member had attained. In response, the Gazette invoked California Government Code Sections 6250-6276.48 to request specific current annual salaries. On April 23rd, Bush asked that the Gazette fill out and submit a form, and indicated he had asked staff to run a report containing the requested information. The Gazette received three large packets from Bush. Bush informed the Gazette that each packet showed salaries for employees in the three school years: 2006-2007, 2007-2008, and 2008-2009. In an enclosed letter, Bush explained that no report was yet available for 2009-2010, described some limitations of the enclosed reports, and offered to meet with the Gazette to review the reports. The first of the above reports showed $117,706 under the “Earnings” column for Sweeney. The later two reports showed $147,350 and $147,351 respectively under the “Earnings” columns for Sweeney. The Gazette did not realize that the increase was due not to a raise, but to Sweeney only working for part of the 2006-2007 school year because he started work after the beginning of the school year. A similar mistake was made in the analysis of Assistant Superintendents’ salaries. In a memo to all FUTA staff, Sweeney stated, “When I was hired in the District, the Board signed a three-year contract with me for approximately $145,000. Currently, my total salary is approximately $152,000.” The Gazette would welcome an explanation from Sweeney as to why the data provided lists his current salary as $147,351. To add to the confusion, a stack of copies of an anonymous letter to the editor was found next to a copy machine at Fillmore Middle School (FMS). The letter was signed “A Concerned and Dedicated Teacher”. Although the letter was addressed to the Gazette, it was never submitted, and the Gazette only learned of its existence because an FMS employee who found the letter brought it to our attention. The letter praised the FUSD administration, criticized the union leadership, and noted that it was left by the copy machine for teachers to read in case the Gazette refused to print the letter. The Gazette respects sources who wish to remain anonymous to the general public or make off-the-record statements. It is against Gazette policy to print anonymous letters without verifying that the writer is legitimate, but in any case, whoever wrote that letter did not submit it for publication. Other anonymous communications reveal a disturbing trend. The Gazette first received two anonymous calls regarding the School District’s financial crisis during the week of April 20th. Martin Farrell, the Gazette Publisher, took both calls on two separate days. He believes the same woman called both times. She angrily claimed that Marvel was spreading lies, and that Marvel and Gazette Website Engineer Scott Duckett were working together against the District. On Monday, April 27th, Assistant Superintendent Evalene Townend spoke with Duckett on the phone and said she would be sending information to counter Marvel’s April 21st figures regarding administrative staff at other districts. Late that same afternoon, an anonymous woman claiming to be a teacher who attended the Fillmore Unified Teachers Association (FUTA) social phoned Duckett. She said that five other teachers were present listening to the call, and proceeded to accuse Duckett, the Gazette, and Duckett’s mother (CSEA Executive Board Member Sheila Duckett) of deliberately lying. She claimed that Marvel’s facts regarding districts’ staffing in the April 23rd Gazette article were wrong, and accused Scott Duckett of collaborating with Marvel to “get the District”. According to Scott, she had very detailed information about a recent and supposedly private conversation between Townend and Sheila Duckett. At 2:06 p.m. on Tuesday, April 28th, Townend provided Scott Duckett with her lists of other districts’ administrative staffs via email. Duckett replied at 2:34 p.m. by thanking Townend for the information and that he would look at everything as soon as he could. The Gazette’s established deadline for submission of articles is Tuesday 3:00 p.m. Duckett examined the lists on Wednesday, April 29th, and emailed Townend requesting more information and stated, “And to be fair, I’ll give Theresa a chance to respond.” He never received a reply to that email. On the morning of Thursday, April 30th, before the Gazette staff arrived, an anonymous caller left a message criticizing Duckett for not printing a correction. The caller said, “Yes. This message is for Scott Duckett. Um, looked for the article today correcting the information you and I spoke on the phone last week and you asked me to ask Mrs. Townend to get you that information and I met with her yesterday and she promised me she sent you that information and just as I suspected you didn’t print a correction. Way to go boy.” After 3 p.m. on that same day, the Gazette received another anonymous call which was also recorded on the answering machine because the Gazette Office Manager had left for the day. The message said: “Hi, this message is um for Scott um Duckle (sic) or some yeah um. I teach at the middle school here in Fillmore. And our union president came to me and asked me if I would be willing to do an article for Mr. Duckle (sic)? Stating that um the district improperly noticed me when I was being let go? And was told that others another teacher was going to make that statement? And I just want to go on record as stating that is completely untrue? I met with both my supervisor and Ms. Townend? At the district office? And neither my principal nor she representing the district ever made that type of statement. And I’m just hoping before you print something from our union president that’s not true as she’s fighting against the district and also spreading other rumors that are not true that you check your information out before you take her word for it because other things I don’t know if you know but other things that she’s given you that you’re printing are not true as well. Thank you.” Because the caller indicated that she wanted to go on record, but did not leave her name, the Gazette made every effort to locate her. No Fillmore Middle School (FMS) teachers received pink slips this year. Two FMS teachers resigned, but each one of them spoke with the Gazette, and said they did not leave the message. One FMS teacher received a non-reelect notice, but the Gazette was unable to reach that teacher for comment. Several witnesses from FMS said that the voice did not belong to any FMS teacher. On Monday, May 4th, Townend called for Duckett twice and left messages with the Office Manager each time. During Townend’s second call, the Office Manager told her that Scott was busy and he could not talk to her at that time. On Tuesday, May 5th, a woman who refused to identify herself called and asked to speak with “Scott.” After being told that Scott was not available, she asked to speak to “Martin.” According to a statement by Martin Farrell, “The caller, somewhat agitated, identified herself as a Middle School teacher who had just resigned, and immediately launched into sharp criticism of the Gazette for ‘writing’ a story which was critical of Ms. Townend.” Farrell said, “I told the caller that she should contact Scott Duckett because he was doing some work on school budget cut-backs. In an exasperated tone of voice she told me that she had called twice ‘yesterday’ and was told that Scott couldn’t take the call at that time.” --The two messages left on the Gazette's answering machine can be heard by clicking on the play button of the player at the top of this article. The answering machine time stamp heard at the end of each message is slow by 1 hour and 22 minutes. The actual times of the calls are approximately 8:43 a.m. and 3:19 p.m. |
- Login or register to post comments
- Printer-friendly version


That article was really hard
That article was really hard to follow.
This is the problem with a small community. Everyone knows everyone else and all their buisness, whether its true or false.
Good Luck sorting out this mess!!!
I was able to follow the
I was able to follow the story, it's just that the circumstances are somewhat bizarre--and the Gazette has no control over that. Perhaps as the rest of the input and rebuttal comes to light, it will make more sense.
Yes the story was a little
Yes the story was a little hard to follow, not due to the Gazette, but due to the bizarre actions of the District Office. Do you know that today, Thursday May 14, and tomorrow Evalene Townend is running....yes I said running, a board of people that she handpicked to choose two new principals of our schools! Why is she still running that board?! [Edited sentence for questionable presumption of wrongdoing] And why is the school board sitting by doing nothing? To quote Jeff Sweeney himself...."The opposite of love is not hate, it is indifference. The opposite of art is not ugliness, it is indifference. The opposite of faith is not heresy, it is indifference. And the opposite of life is not death, it is indifference." (Original author Ellie Wiesel, holocaust survivor). So if he really believes that, then why do his actions speak so much louder than his words? Tell me neighbors and friends....these are the people we trust to run our school board and our district?
Just out of curiousity, what
Just out of curiousity, what should she be under investigation for? You never stated that in your post. Isn't Evalene Townend the Human Resource director for the district? I've always thought Human Resources are supposed to be involved in the hiring process or is there another way that you know? From your post, how does the quote from Jeff Sweeney tie into the rest of the post? I don't see the connection. Would you please explain it to me? Sorry for all the questions but I like to be well informed before I make any decisions.
Word of warning to all
Word of warning to all people. Just because it's written by a paper (no offense meant to the editors or reporters)or spoken from on individual to another, the information could be incorrect. If that "misinformation" gets repeated enough by enough people, it will be believed as fact.
I hope this is ok to provide a link to a yahoo news article I found rather enlightening. It shows exactly what I just stated and can happen anytime, anywhere.
The title of the article is "Irish student hoaxes world's media with fake quote" and was written by Shawn Pogatchnik, Associated Press Writer. http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Irish-student-hoaxes-worlds-apf-15201451.h...
Just in case your not aware
Just in case your not aware of it the audio that the gazette has is [name deleted for absence of proof of identity] impersonating a middle school teacher trying to defend her own actions. And to explain the Jeff Sweeney quote, he quoted Ellie Weisel on indifference. The school board already knows this information about [name deleted] and yet has stayed indifferent. The apathy of the school board is killing our district.
I would appreciate more info
I would appreciate more info too on what you posted mammabird, I kind of get the gist of it, from past posts and stories on the Gazette, but it does seem like an awful lot is going on behind the scenes and the whole story hasnt come out.
I read the story of the hoax before, amazing. I dont think an email comes tru my inbox, that isnt some type of a hoax, or half truth, I rarely pass anything along these days..
While this article is
While this article is disconcerting, it is important to remember that there is always a process that must be followed. Just because we have not heard of any action taken by the administration or the school board does not mean it is not going on. Due process must be followed.
I'm assuming that you have
I'm assuming that you have proof to back this up, mommabird? If so, I'd like to see it. If it's something you've heard and passed on then it's considered 'hear-say' (not the correct spelling) and not proof. If it's something you've read and passed on, I'd like to see the original article so that I can verify it. I'm just looking for verifiable proof. If it can't be proven then I and others won't believe it.
Teacher1234, why can't more
Teacher1234, why can't more think like that?
Let's see if we can
Let's see if we can hypothetically solve this mystery. Let's say you ran a business and the union leader your employees elected said some disparaging things about your leadership and organization. These things ended up in the paper and some folks around you got mad. Unbeknownst to you one of your managers decides on their own attack the credibility of both the newspaper and the union leader by lying and leaving two phone messages in which this manager disparages the union boss and makes fun of the guy who wrote the article all the while pretending to be a person or persons who you, the owner of the business let go some time before. Does this make sense? Attack the credibility of others by lying that you met with yourself and told yourself you were great while pretending to be someone else. Then, cement the deal by writing a missive intended to also attack the union boss and leave it in the union headquarters all the while pretending that you didn't write it and pretending you're someone else.
I hope this clears up what hypothetically may have happened here.
I agree it is the situation
I agree it is the situation that is hard to follow.
The rumor mill was rampant today at the schools. This article spread like wildfire through the schools. I know of several teachers that hooked up speakers afterschool so they could listen to the messages. Many of them have a strong opinion about who this person is. If it is who they suspect...what an embarrassment to FUSD. It wouldn't surprise many of the teachers as they feel this particular person has been manipulative with her position.
That said there is more to the picture besides some rant on a phone message.
It's sad when teachers are represent by a union president that can be too aggressive. Many teachers have decided to stay out of the politics because of the abrasive way meetings have been held. This is a time more than ever that we need our union to be supported but when everyone is afraid to step up and participate, things don't get handled the best ways possible. (for me the eye opener was the FUTA social. not the plesant even I thought it would be)
We do have good leaders at the DO and in the Union.
Unfortunately they have now been tainted by the actions of one, maybe more.
From what I can see we have two things working against us right now:
- Some members of the DO that put their self interests before the common good of the district.
- Bad FUTA representation that is not willing to work with the DO which in turn has caused them to not want to work with our union, splitting hairs over little issues so that the bigger issues get put off.
We will have to wait and see where this all goes. Only time will tell.
PS. Only 13 more days until school gets out! Then what?
Union President too
Union President too aggresive-----
When was the last vote taken to put her in that position? Anyone know the numbers?
JB
Your union president ran
Your union president ran unopposed except for a last minute write in campaign, so if you want to blame anyone for what some people are saying is bad FUTA representation, then you can just blame yourselves. In my opinion, a union president needs to be aggressive, they need to be strong, they need to be able to challenge authority. That is what they do. As teachers, you should be treated with respect, professionalism and fairness. The district office should have to try to work with your union, not the other way around. They have failed to recognize the validity of your union at every turn, and are dismissive in their dealings with FUTA. What solid examples can anyone give of anyone at the DO trying to work fairly with FUTA when an issue came up that they did not agree on? The teacher's union has power in solidarity. Divisiveness will get you nowhere except in the district's pocket, and that seems like right where some of you want to be, but I can't for the life of me figure out why. Unions exist for the sole purpose of standing up for teacher's rights. You would not have the salary schedules and health and welfare benefits that you have now if aggressive people (who came many years before your current president) had not stood up for teacher's rights. All I can say is, figure out what side you are on - if you want your union to be better, get involved. Don't do it by bad mouthing your president.
It is interesting that the
It is interesting that the FUSD DO is finally showing the community what they are really made of. But those of us who have seen them in action are not surprised. The way they handle a simple news story is not unlike the way they do business. Lies, cover-ups, deception, they do it all. It is true that our union pres. has not been the poster person for HR, but in that same spirit, neither has our HR Superintendent. I don't in anyway condone what went on at our recent social, but honestly--it takes a Bully to bring one down.
FHSalum or anyone this is
FHSalum or anyone
this is the 2nd reference I've read to something happening at the social. What happened?
JB
June Bug, you took the
June Bug, you took the question right out of my mouth--WHAT did happen at the social, doesnt sound good?!
and Samalama, some GOOD points, and interesting to hear the other side. Still, if it is in such a mess right now, it didnt get that way from just one side acting unprofessional and devisive. To run it into the ditch like this, you needed help from both sides.
Thank you Fillmore Native
Thank you Fillmore Native for your clarity of thought. Just like any relationship it takes two to make it succeed or fail. In response to Samalama, you are correct that if you don't like how things are being run then you should get involved. However I will say there is a difference between being aggressive and adversarial. A good leader knows when to take a stand, when to listen and when to take a step back. I don't think the FUTA President is a bad person. I believe she has had some error in judgement. Just like I don't believe the administration is out to stick it to the teachers. When money is involved, it can get very nasty. I just hope cooler heads will prevail and respect and diplomacy can return to what used to be a amicable working relationship.
I think all of society is
I think all of society is coarser and less willing to negotiate and take the high road. What we need are more gentlemen like Bill Shaffer, and ladies like Dolores Day! And when ever you see a woman be aggressive, well, a man can do it, and be effective, a woman will always be viewed unfavorabley, I'm afraid. But I have to say, I've seen some very good, fair minded posts here lately, looking at more than one side. Is there hope yet for Society?? perhaps..
FN You are refering to
FN
You are refering to "polite society" which doesn't hardly exist anymore. I had two young boys accidently bump into me a few weeks ago and both apologized. I almost fell over on my own. I've had grown men almost knock me off my feet and not say a word, or let the door slam in my face. I make a point of saying thank you when a man does hold a door open for me. My pet peeve is language. I hear boys as young as 7 swearing in public. They think it's cool. Teenage and 20-somethings are the worst. They don't think twice about saying the F-word or anything else in front of a woman old enough to be their grandmother--again, grown men, too. It pollutes the air we breath. Men use to save this behaviour for the locker room or cigar lounge, not in the presence of a lady (also a dieing breed) or children. Now it's everywhere. I hate it.
Great point, FillmoreNative
Great point, FillmoreNative - if the union president was a man, I doubt that any of this "aggressive" talk would even have come up. She would be called powerful and forceful. At the social, President Marvel presented some district budget information. A member took exception to her inciting the members at the social, saying this was the first FUTA event she had been to. I think this is what people are referring to. The member who expressed dismay at President Marvel's sharing of the district budget info is married to a district administrator. I didn't think it was a big deal - President Marvel agreed that she would close the issue, the social went on as planned, people ate and drank and that was that.
Oh, June Bug, you and me
Oh, June Bug, you and me both!!! JUST MAKES ME SICK to hear people talk like that and especially now with my gray hair and grandkids, have they no shame whatsoever??? I've asked a 20 something man in Target, to 'hey, can you please watch your language, there's kids around here'...not said angrily either, and he got in my face and was MORE abusive. Boy, if one of my sons ever did that, even grown, I'd have them by the ear and give them a good talking to!! As it is, my teenage son still gets corrected for walking in front of an adult, without an 'excuse me' and is reminded to open doors, help with packages, etc. I think this is where it starts! Just a few minutes here and there, to train your kids up, in the way they should go. You know, it's a shame those pesky 10 comandments got tossed, there's this one that's really great--"HONOR THY FATHER AND THY MOTHER" ---if a child is taught that, it is only the next logical step to honor your elders and everyone else too..
As I see it, we have many
As I see it, we have many problems within the educational system of Fillmore (District Office, School Board and Community) mainly which center on responsibility, rust, "true" open communication and involvement. As someone said earlier, money causes problems, all parties must acknowledge that prior knowledge of cuts was forecasted - this has not occurred within the last month or months.
Comments:
District Office - I agree with comments of "Say What" in that the District has become "self-serving" but also arrogant in dealing with its employees and the public. Remember who you ultimately work for the Fillmore Community. What is the DO doing in these ecomonic times in sharing when cost cuts are necessary with its top heavy organization - salary or work-time reductions? Also, can an employee bring an issue to you without fear of retribution? Have you truly been open? The Superintendent is utlimately responsible for any actions of his staff (himself on down) and should take swift corrective action for their inappropriate manner/dealings with the employees and the public, or abuse of power.
School Board - Reminder, you were elected by the Community NOT the District Office. Listen, question and make/demand alternatives to what you are told then take action (remember there are students and employees impacted by your action or inaction). Kudos to Tony Prado for his actions and to the others - shame on you for not doing the above. More time should be allowed for public comments and questions without the DO running the show.
The DO head financial officer said in a recent public meeting "...these are rough figures...", but under these economic times why was he not told this unacceptable and to provide accurate figures with due haste? If anyone should have access to the true and accurate financials, it should be the DO financial officer.
Community - General populous and/or parent - get involved, listen and question what you hear or are told. It is your school, kids, job and community. Do not idly stand by - get involved by speaking out and voting!
In the first sentence,
In the first sentence, "rust" should have been "trust"
Corrected - As I see it, we have many problems within the educational system of Fillmore (District Office, School Board and Community) mainly which center on responsibility, trust, "true" open communication and involvement.
dont worry, the typos keep
dont worry, the typos keep it interesting! And I think I'm the only one to post here, who has never had a pyto.
I disagree that the District
I disagree that the District has become self-serving. There are some very hardworkers in our administration. Jeff Sweney has been a breath of fresh air for this district.
However you are correct that true open communication and trust has been lost this year. Personality issues and pride from both sides need to be put aside so we can move forward.
Teacher1234 - There are
Teacher1234 - There are hardworkers in the entire school-wide staff but to be fair, the burden of cost cutting must be shared at the district office level as well, that is partly what I meant by self-serving. Maybe self protection would be a better description of the DO's sharing in cost cutting.
Any change can seem like a "breath of fresh air"; however, certain members of the DO have caused the air to become stagnant thus possibly tarnishing Jeff Sweney. By stagnant, I reiterate previous statement "inappropriate manner/dealings with the employees and the public, or abuse of power".
By your moniker, you appear to be a teacher (math?), the issue of cost cutting is not just two sides (the DO and teachers)but multiple sides.
Yes, I am a teacher...not
Yes, I am a teacher...not math. It was just an easy moniker to come up with. :) You are correct in the cost cutting must be shared by all. I appreciate you clarifying your response. There is a Board meeting tomorrow night at 6:00 at the district office for anyone in the community who would like to be part of the solution instead of part of the problem. You are one or the other. There is no middle gorund I'm afraid.
Too bad the board meeting is
Too bad the board meeting is on the same evening as the high school's Open House. Who controls the district calendar?
The district calendar is
The district calendar is finalized by the board. It is also on the agenda for this evening. The Union has had very little say on the structure of next year's calendar, unlike past years.
If your question regarding
If your question regarding the district calendar pertains to the scheduling of events, the Board meetings have been every other Tuesday for as long as I can remember. Unless I'm mistaken, the High School could have chosen a different night. If your question regarding the district calendar is referring to beginning and ending of school as well as holidays and breaks I would refer you to the district office for answers to those questions.